never had a momo, never used one..
my guess: you have to set the pedals separate in windows, from the driver.
my guess: you have to set the pedals separate in windows, from the driver.
Yes it is frustrating trying to pick a racing server between all the 100's of drift servers
Also I don't remember seeing an option to hide full servers ingame. Sometimes you can join, but can not race, only spectate. So the "full" status could be determined by actual allowed racers
Also I don't remember seeing an option to hide full servers ingame. Sometimes you can join, but can not race, only spectate. So the "full" status could be determined by actual allowed racers
read first post maybe?
Most of the servers with people in them are drift servers.
How about you share this secret ARB thing with the rest of us?
Ok thanks for the info, I'll check them out.
This thread is going nowhere, so let's just agree to disagree.. 
For the record, my point of view was not to "eliminate all setups", but to restrict some car's setups to some degree. A lot less settings for road cars and realistic, physically possible gearbox settings accuracy for all cars.
And I know how to make setups, claiming that those wanting to see restrictions are retarded noobs is not very mature.
So let's move on!
Is there some place one can download setups for endurance racing? My goal is to find one set which I can get used to. Constant fiddling with setups prevents learning the car's behavior in all situations. This can be dangerous for other drivers as well, losing control and causing pileups is not a very good thing..
Now that I think of it, isn't it kind of weird that unstable WR setups are available and apparently widely used, but "general" setups are not.
So could you please post your safe (easy to drive), semi-competetive all-around setups?
For the record, my point of view was not to "eliminate all setups", but to restrict some car's setups to some degree. A lot less settings for road cars and realistic, physically possible gearbox settings accuracy for all cars.
And I know how to make setups, claiming that those wanting to see restrictions are retarded noobs is not very mature.
So let's move on!
Is there some place one can download setups for endurance racing? My goal is to find one set which I can get used to. Constant fiddling with setups prevents learning the car's behavior in all situations. This can be dangerous for other drivers as well, losing control and causing pileups is not a very good thing..
Now that I think of it, isn't it kind of weird that unstable WR setups are available and apparently widely used, but "general" setups are not.
So could you please post your safe (easy to drive), semi-competetive all-around setups?
Ken kuuseen kurkottaa
Ketä ei ole oikea sana (ainakaan tässä yhteydessä)
What's with the attitude!
In LFS tracks are static (Becky made a good post about this issue), so in theory they can be driven with machine-like precision. This is hardly realistic, RL drivers can not do this.
Limiting setups per track / car would not work, one could always just copy the files before race.. And if the setups were not separate files, we could not use setup analyzers. I like the idea though.
Physics changes will eventually make unrealistic setups obsolete.
In LFS tracks are static (Becky made a good post about this issue), so in theory they can be driven with machine-like precision. This is hardly realistic, RL drivers can not do this.
Limiting setups per track / car would not work, one could always just copy the files before race.. And if the setups were not separate files, we could not use setup analyzers. I like the idea though.
Physics changes will eventually make unrealistic setups obsolete.
Thanks for the info! This puts LFS's setup options into perspective.
Oh I forgot, real life has nothing to do with this game.. I can not setup the car better than IRL racers and I am slower than those that can -> I suck.
/thread
unable to locate fail
Cleaning up old drivers is recommended. There are utilities for that.
I meant to reply to Bawbag:s message.
My reasoning was based on the fact that the "fast setups" more often than not exploit physics "features" that really should not be there. Locked diffs is one example.
Yeah, nobody has to use these sets if they don't want to, that is true.
So one could say there is nothing unfair here, we all have access to WR-sets.
My point is that I would like to race with realistic setups WITHOUT it being a disadvantage. If you don't see this as an issue, that is fine too.
LFS is supposed to be a simulator, remember?
My reasoning was based on the fact that the "fast setups" more often than not exploit physics "features" that really should not be there. Locked diffs is one example.
Yeah, nobody has to use these sets if they don't want to, that is true.
So one could say there is nothing unfair here, we all have access to WR-sets.
My point is that I would like to race with realistic setups WITHOUT it being a disadvantage. If you don't see this as an issue, that is fine too.
LFS is supposed to be a simulator, remember?
I did not start this thread, and I have already expressed my view on this matter. Let's keep this on topic
Maybe you are right, it's not the setups per se that are making LFS less interesting. But this issue would be really easy to fix, so why are you against it? I don't mean to flame, I just can't understand why would anyone be opposed to closer / more realistic racing..
Yes I am, both offer unfair advantage and are not available in real life.
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG